Prediction of Jonathan Smith vs Birger Andersson Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Smith vs B. Andersson

Jonathan Smith

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

130

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Birger Andersson

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

130

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Andersson

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonathan Smith winning 2 and Birger Andersson winning 0. The last match between Jonathan Smith and Birger Andersson was at the Beckenham, 11-06-1973, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Jonathan Smith getting the victory 6-4 9-8.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Smith	1
Andersson	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Beckenham(06-11-73)

Stats

Jonathan Smith

Birger Andersson

J. Smith vs B. Andersson H2H Profile

J. Smith	Stats	B. Andersson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
40.74% (66-96)	Career Total W/L	35.54% (43-78)
1	Grass	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Smith vs B. Andersson Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jonathan Smith has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Birger Andersson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jonathan Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Birger Andersson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jonathan Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birger Andersson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jonathan Smith has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Birger Andersson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jonathan Smith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 29/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/38). Birger Andersson has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 45% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 4/12).
Player level: In the last year, Jonathan Smith has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Birger Andersson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jonathan Smith winning 1 times and Birger Andersson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonathan Smith winning 2 and Birger Andersson winning 0.
The last match between Jonathan Smith and Birger Andersson was at the Beckenham, 11-06-1973, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Jonathan Smith getting the victory 6-4 9-8.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jonathan Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Birger Andersson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jonathan Smith has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birger Andersson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jonathan Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birger Andersson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jonathan Smith vs Birger Andersson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Smith vs B. Andersson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Smith	Stats	B. Andersson
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
15	Games Won	12
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Smith Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Vienna - 18-11-1985
R3 Sergio CasalS. Casal	L	6-2 6-7 6-3	Stats
Marrakech CH - 01-04-1985
R3 Claudio MezzadriC. Mezzadri	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Vienna CH - 04-03-1985
R3 Menno OostingM. Oosting	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Auckland - 07-01-1985
R3 Broderick DykeB. Dyke	L	6-7 6-0 6-3	Stats
Melbourne - 24-12-1984
R4 Christo Van RensburgC. Van	L	3-6 6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

B. Andersson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bastad - 14-07-1980
SF Balazs TaroczyB. Taroczy	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
R4 Stefan SimonssonS. Simonsson	W	3-6 6-0 6-4	Stats
QF Mario MartinezM. Martinez	W	6-4 3-6 6-4	Stats
R3 Carlos KirmayrC. Kirmayr	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
Hamburg - 12-05-1980
R2 Dominique BedelD. Bedel	L	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Smith vs B. Andersson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Smith	Stats	B. Andersson
40.74% (66/96)	YTD Win/Loss	35.83% (43/77)
42.12% (171/235)	Sets Win/Loss	39.74% (120/182)
47.00% (1840/2075)	Games Win/Loss	45.85% (1293/1527)
40.00% (12/18)	Hard Win/Loss	25.00% (4/12)
45.31% (29/35)	Clay Win/Loss	38.64% (34/54)
37.50% (3/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	22.22% (2/7)
36.67% (22/38)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (2/3)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
619.2	Average Opponent Rank	575.67
25.00% (5/15)	Slam W/L	28.57% (2/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	50.00% (1/1)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	44.44% (4/5)
38.46% (35/56)	Main Tour W/L	34.07% (31/60)
53.06% (26/23)	Challenger W/L	45.45% (5/6)
43% (60/141)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (34/100)
26% (5/19)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	44% (8/18)
48% (26/54)	Deciding Set Win %	39% (15/38)
77% (70/54)	1st Set Won, Won Match	65% (46/30)
23% (70/16)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	35% (46/16)
13% (91/12)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (73/12)